Peak food: Are we going to run out of food?

Yaleglobal recently published a concise article on the status of the world’s food production and consumption. It is a very similar situation to “Peak Oil” that I discussed here. In both the food an oil industries, the law of diminishing returns has resulted in a peak in food production, consumption grows strongly with population growth and ultimately exceeds supply. In both markets, market forces are distorted and do not operate efficiently to promote longer term changes that increase supply, reduce demand, encourage greater efficiency and improve resource allocation on the demand and supply side.

I have extracted a few paragraphs from the Yaleglobal for your convenience below:

  • The miracle that has fed us for a whole generation now was the Green Revolution: higher-yielding crops that enabled us to almost triple world food production between 1950 and 1990 while increasing the area of farmland by no more than 10 per cent.
  • The global population more than doubled [since 1950], so we are now living on less than half the land per person than our grandparents needed. But that was a one-time miracle, and it is over. Since the beginning of the 1990s, crop yields have essentially stopped rising.
  • The world’s food stocks have shrunk by half since 1999, from a reserve big enough to feed the entire world for 116 days then to a predicted low of only 57 days by the end of this year.
  • We are still living off the proceeds of the Green Revolution, but that hit diminishing returns 20 years ago. Now we live in a finely balanced situation where world food supply just about meets demand, with no reserve to cover further population growth. But the population will grow anyway, and the world’s existing grain supply for human consumption is being eroded by three different factors: meat, heat and biofuels.
  • MEAT: As incomes rise, so does the consumption of meat, and feeding animals for meat is a very inefficient way of using grain. It takes between 11 and 17 calories of food (almost all grain) to produce one calorie of beef, pork or chicken, and the world’s production of meat has increased fivefold since 1950.
  • HEAT: To add to worries, beyond a certain point, hotter temperatures directly reduce grain yields. Current estimates suggest that the yield of the main grain crops drops 10 per cent, on average, for every one degree Celsius that the mean temperature exceeds the optimum for that crop during the growing season.
  • BIOFUELS: In effect, food is being turned into fuel - and the amount of ethanol needed to fill a big four-wheel-drive SUV just once uses enough grain to feed one person for an entire year.
    • A “rational economist” would expect the market to undertake an investment opportunity in this situation, but the market does not behave how a rational economist would expect. This may be a result of distortions introduced by government, short term investment horizons or greater investment returns available in other industries. The market generally waits for the certaintly of higher prices before undertaking investment. Even with higher prices, greater investment in an industry is far from certain. The oil industry has had record prices over the last few years. Greater investment in supply would be expected. Instead, the oil industry has not invested and distributed record profits to shareholders. In three previous periods of oil price rises, the oil companies made significant investments in new supply. When the new supply came online seven years later, oil prices had fallen to previous levels, significantly reducing their expected returns.

      In the oil industry, it takes a minimum of seven years for an investment to result in production of oil. I wonder how long an investment in the food industry results in greater production of food. If the delay is similar too oil, it may be easier and more certain for countries needing food to invest in the military, rather than food industry.

      In oil and food, there seem to be impediments to encouraging the development of alternatives, encouraging greater efficiency, optimising allocation amongst competing needs and removing market distortions. The WTO has endeavoured to remove subsidies for food production. For whatever reason, they have not succeeded and world prices are less than the market price, which may result in under investment in food production. These are considered complex issues. I think the issues are simple. Demand is outstripping supply of food and oil. The issue must be addressed immediately. How do we encourage consumers to consume less, allocate increasingly scarce resources to higher priority uses, and encourage investment in supply.

      Share/Save/Bookmark

      About the Author

      Marcus Cake

      Marcus Cake is passionate about applying online social network concepts to transform financial markets and economic development. Please see the Summary page or Overview presentation. Marcus's primary project at Marcuscake.com is the launch of a public online industry network for the equity market . He is also keen to make a contribution, share knowledge and highlight other opportunities to apply online social networking elements including E-democracy, climate stability. Marcus Cake has 14 years experience as a venture capitalist, technology investment banker (mergers and acquisitions) and as a software entrepreneur. Please see Marcus Cake's profile. Profile (detailed) | Linkedin profile | Projects | Opportunities | What we do? Contact details | Projects | Opportunities! | My map location | Calendar (free,busy,location) | Videos (public,favourite,IPhone) | Presentations (private/public/favourite) | Twitter broadcasts

      3 Responses to “ Peak food: Are we going to run out of food? ”

      1. [...] I have recently written articles on Peak Oil and Peak Food. In both cases, the law of :diminishingreturns: has resulted in a peak in production, consumption grows strongly with population growth and ultimately exceeds supply. In all cases, market forces are distorted and do not operate efficiently to promote longer term changes that increase supply, reduce demand, encourage greater efficiency and improve resource allocation on the demand and supply side. Generalisations are, ofcourse, universally wrong, but they serve a useful starting point to focus attention. Further discussion introduces complexity that usually results in inaction, despite a compelling need for action. In an era with greater demand for quality leadership, is the supply of leadership in decline. Does the law of diminishing returns apply to political leadership? The issues are simple.  The fiscal management of many countries is questionable (see :ThedeclineoftheUSdollar: and the article on global capital markets for more information. H The core function of our leadership is to safeguard the essentials of life for the global community. A secondary objective may be fiscal management. Given the inaction around :peakoil:, :peakfood:, climate change and the poor fiscal management of some countries, the supply of leadership appears to be in decline. The world confronts key challenges. Demand is outstripping supply of food, oil and water. Many countries are insolvent through unrestrained consumption, unserviceable debt and unfundable promises. The action that needs to be taken is generally agreed, but political leadership is keen to defer implementation for a few more years. The global community also suffers from Peak Leadership. An increasing demand for leadership, and declining supply. As a community, how do we increase the supply of leadership? Leadership will come from the people. People aren’t apathetic, they just don’t have an online network to channel their interests. Online networks already exist that provide quality research into specific problems, indentify solutions that need to be implemented, and endeavour to lobby for their implementation. These are small relative to the influence of “public relations”. Individuals will increasingly realise that the internet provides them with their opportunity to make a unique contribution. The dissatisfaction with political leadership will encourage them to get involved. The influence of online networks will son outweigh that of the public relations industry. The participation of our political leadership in online networks may also became an critical factor in a whether a candidate gets elected. However, the ultimate influence of an online network will be directly related to the number and contribution of its members. Greater participation in online networks by all members of the community will be essential for their credibility. Online networks could make a significant contribution to representative democracy. [...]

      2. [...] I have recently written articles on Peak Oil and Peak Food. In both cases, the law of diminishing returns has resulted in a peak in production, consumption grows strongly with population growth and ultimately exceeds supply. Market forces do not operate efficiently to promote longer term changes that increase supply, reduce demand, encourage greater efficiency and improve resource allocation on the demand and supply side. [...]

      3. [...] DRAFT! WORK IN PROGRESS! (This draft is publicly available to obtain feedback from third parties) Prerequisite reading: Online network business model (generic) ; Peak leadership: is the demand for leadership outstripping supply? ; Peak food: Are we going to run out of food? ; Will Peak Oil cause a depression from 2010? ; Peak leadership: the demand for leadership is growing rapidly and supply is declining ; The transition to online networks may take six months or 50 years ; Phase in online networks … Phase out intellectual property The inspiration for this article is a video that I received by email. It is a plea from a child to the adults of the world at a conference in 1992. [...]

      Leave a Reply

      You must be logged in to post a comment.