Will Peak Oil cause a depression from 2010?

Extract: When world oil production peaks, there will still be large reserves remaining. Peaking means that the rate of world oil production cannot increase; it also means that production will thereafter decrease with time. “When world oil peaking will occur is not known with certainty. Some experts believe peaking may occur soon … within 20 years.” It may occur as early as 2010. World oil demand is expected to grow 50 percent by 2025. “Peaking will result in dramatically higher oil prices, which will cause protracted economic hardship in the United States and the world. However, the problems are not insoluble. Timely, aggressive mitigation initiatives addressing both the supply and the demand sides of the issue will be required.” North America has 5% of global oil reserves, a declining 17% share of global oil production and consumes 30% of the worlds oil. The Middle East has 62% of global proven oil reserves, produces 31% and consumes 7% of the worlds oil.

The previous article A technology boom through to 2010 highlighted the potential for a technology boom through to 2010, to be followed by a depression. The primary cause for the depression post 2010 was demographic. After 2010, the “Baby boomers” retire and spending on goods and services decline. Peak oil may also cause or contribute to a depression post 2010. This post was inpsired by a documentary on Peak Oil. The broadband version of the documentary is available here and the supporting information is here.
According to Wikipedia:

Peak Oil” as a proper noun, also known as Hubbert’s peak, refers to a singular event in history: the peak of the entire planet’s oil production. After Peak Oil, according to the Hubbert Peak Theory, the rate of oil production on Earth will enter a terminal decline.

The Hubbert Peak theory posits that for any given geographical area, from an individual oil field to the planet as a whole, the rate of oil production tends to follow a bell-shaped curve. Early in the curve (pre-peak), production increases due to the addition of infrastructure. Late in the curve (post-peak), production declines due to resource depletion.

Oil production may peak as early as 2010. Up until 2010, supply may be able to satisfy demand. From 2010, demand will exceed supply by a significant margin. This will cause significant rises in oil prices. Consumers that have been use to cheap petrol will have to adjust.

Oil companies have been reluctant to invest in additional production, refining and transportation capacity. It takes seven years for an investment to result in oil production. In the three previous periods of high oil prices, oil companies have invested and seven years later, the prices were much lower. Oil companies have been accumulating cash or returning cash to shareholders.
Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation and Risk Management February 2005 (PDF)

Extract:

“World oil demand is expected to grow 50 percent by 2025.”

“When world oil production peaks, there will still be large reserves remaining. Peaking means that the rate of world oil production cannot increase; it also means that production will thereafter decrease with time.”

“The peaking of world oil production presents the U.S. and the world with an unprecedented risk management problem. As peaking is approached, liquid fuel prices and price volatility will increase dramatically, and, without timely mitigation,the economic, social, and political costs will be unprecedented. Viable mitigation options exist on both the supply and demand sides, but to have substantial impact, they must be initiated more than a decade in advance of peaking.”

“Besides further oil exploration, there are commercial options for increasing world oil supply and for the production of substitute liquid fuels: 1) Improved Oil Recovery (IOR) can marginally increase production from existing reservoirs; one of the largest of the IOR opportunities is Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), which can help moderate oil production declines from reservoirs that are past their peak production: 2) Heavy oil / oil sands represents a large resource of lower grade oils, now primarily produced in Canada and Venezuela; those resources are capable of significant production increases;. 3) Coal liquefaction is a wellestablished technique for producing clean substitute fuels from the world’s abundant coal reserves; and finally, 4) Clean substitute fuels can be produced from remotely located natural gas, but exploitation must compete with the world’s growing demand for liquefied natural gas. However, world-scale contributions from these options will require 10-20 years of accelerated effort.”

“Important observations and conclusions from this study are as follows:

1. When world oil peaking will occur is not known with certainty. A fundamental problem in predicting oil peaking is the poor quality of and possible politicalbiases in world oil reserves data. Some experts believe peaking may occur soon. This study indicates that “soon” is within 20 years.

2. The problems associated with world oil production peaking will not be temporary, and past “energy crisis” experience will provide relatively little guidance. The challenge of oil peaking deserves immediate, serious attention, if risks are to be fully understood and mitigation begun on a timely basis.

3. Oil peaking will create a severe liquid fuels problem for the transportation sector, not an “energy crisis in the usual sense that term has been used.

4. Peaking will result in dramatically higher oil prices, which will cause protracted economic hardship in the United States and the world. However, the problems are not insoluble. Timely, aggressive mitigation initiatives addressing both the supply and the demand sides of the issue will be required.

5. In the developed nations, the problems will be especially serious. In the developing nations peaking problems have the potential to be much worse.

6. Mitigation will require a minimum of a decade of intense, expensive effort, because the scale of liquid fuels mitigation is inherently extremely large.

7. While greater end-use efficiency is essential, increased efficiency alone will be neither sufficient nor timely enough to solve the problem. Production of large amounts of substitute liquid fuels will be required. A number of commercial or near-commercial substitute fuel production technologies are currently available for deployment, so the production of vast amounts of substitute liquid fuels is feasible with existing technology.

8. Intervention by governments will be required, because the economic and social implications of oil peaking would otherwise be chaotic. The experiences of the 1970s and 1980s offer important guides as to government actions that are desirable and those that are undesirable, but the process will not be easy.”

Who has the oil? Who supplies oil? Who demands oil?

BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005 (PDF) (BP’s annual world energy report. )

Extract:

Region Global proven reserves 2004 (%) Global production 2004 (%) Global consumption 2004 (%)
North America
5% 17% 30%
South and Central America
8% 9% 6%
Europe and Eurasia
12% 22% 25%
Middle East
62% 31% 7%
Africa
9% 11% 3%
Asia Pacific
4% 10% 29%


Global share of reserves - Top countries
Global share of production - Top countries Global share of consumption - Top countries

Saudi Arabia (22%)
Iran (11%)
Iraq (10%)
Kuwait (8%)
UAE (8%)
Russia (6%)
Venezuala (6%)
Libya (3%)
Nigeria (3%)
Kazakhstan (3%)
USA (2%)
Saudi Arabia (13%)
Russia (11%)
USA (8%)
Venezuala (4%)
Iran (5%)
China (4%)
Iraq (4%)
Kuwait (3%)
UAE (3%)
Nigeria (3%)
USA (25%) China (8%) - with 15% growth
Japan (6%)
India (6%)
Canada (4%)
Russia (3%)
Germany (3%)
France (2%)
Spain (2%)
UK (2%)
Mexico (2%)

     

     

     

North America has 5% of global oil reserves, a declining 17% share of global oil production and consumes 30% of the worlds oil. The Middle East has 62% of global proven oil reserves, produces 31% and consumes 7% of the worlds oil. China produces 4% of global oil production and consumes 8% of the worlds oil. China’s demand for oil is growing at 15%.

Share/Save/Bookmark

About the Author

Marcus Cake

Marcus Cake is passionate about applying online social network concepts to transform financial markets and economic development. Please see the Summary page or Overview presentation. Marcus's primary project at Marcuscake.com is the launch of a public online industry network for the equity market . He is also keen to make a contribution, share knowledge and highlight other opportunities to apply online social networking elements including E-democracy, climate stability. Marcus Cake has 14 years experience as a venture capitalist, technology investment banker (mergers and acquisitions) and as a software entrepreneur. Please see Marcus Cake's profile. Profile (detailed) | Linkedin profile | Projects | Opportunities | What we do? Contact details | Projects | Opportunities! | My map location | Calendar (free,busy,location) | Videos (public,favourite,IPhone) | Presentations (private/public/favourite) | Twitter broadcasts

3 Responses to “ Will Peak Oil cause a depression from 2010? ”

  1. [...] I have recently written articles on Peak Oil and Peak Food. In all cases, the law of diminishing returns has resulted in a peak in production, consumption grows strongly with population growth and ultimately exceeds supply. In all cases, market forces are distorted and do not operate efficiently to promote longer term changes that increase supply, reduce demand, encourage greater efficiency and improve resource allocation on the demand and supply side. Generalisations are, ofcourse, universally wrong, but they serve a useful starting point to focus attention. Greater complexity and discussion more often than not results in inaction. Complexity and discussion often results in inaction. [...]

  2. [...] I have recently written articles on Peak Oil and Peak Food. In both cases, the law of diminishing returns has resulted in a peak in production, consumption grows strongly with population growth and ultimately exceeds supply. Market forces do not operate efficiently to promote longer term changes that increase supply, reduce demand, encourage greater efficiency and improve resource allocation on the demand and supply side. The primary function of our political leadership is to safeguard the essentials of our community - our global community. There is action that can be taken on key issues of oil, food, water, climate change, national insolvency and retirement of the baby boomers. There is just enough time for action. The resources are available for most of the pressing issues. However, precious public funds are spent on more interesting ambitions, rather than the fundamentals. If questioned, more complex issues are introduced to defer the need to make difficult, but simple, decisions. The world confronts key challenges. Action on the essential seems to be perpetually deferred until after the next election. The demand for leadership is growing rapidly. The supply of leadership is in declining. Perhaps, the law of diminishing returns applies to our political leadership. How do we increase the supply of leadership? How do we get our leadership to focus on the essential? [...]

  3. [...] DRAFT! WORK IN PROGRESS! (This draft is publicly available to obtain feedback from third parties) Prerequisite reading: Online network business model (generic) ; Peak leadership: is the demand for leadership outstripping supply? ; Peak food: Are we going to run out of food? ; Will Peak Oil cause a depression from 2010? ; Peak leadership: the demand for leadership is growing rapidly and supply is declining ; The transition to online networks may take six months or 50 years The inspiration for this article is a video that I received by email. It is a plea from a child to the adults of the world at a conference in 1992. [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.